komet

Judges

What the median judge saw

Clarity — “One control room for all your coding agents” clearly explains the product, audience, and job; the “Download komet” CTA is prominent.

Pricing — The site offers “Download komet” but has no pricing page, currency, billing period, plans, refund policy, or fee details.

Trust — GitHub is linked and the page says “no telemetry,” but there are no company details, team page, customer proof, security page, or case studies.

Content — Concrete features include checkpoints, keyboard shortcuts, local storage, CRDT sync, and named agents; the Questions FAQ is useful, though docs are absent.

Design — Dark graphite palette, strong hierarchy, consistent cards, and readable contrast look polished; the enormous empty space and minimal footer weaken the finish.

Mobile — The mobile layout stacks cards cleanly, keeps “Download komet” above the fold, and avoids side scrolling; the product screenshot is quite small.

Onboarding — Downloading is self-serve with no forced call, but there is no signup flow, demo, quickstart, SSO, or explicit getting-started sequence.

Differentiation — “Rust + gpui,” local-first architecture, rewind checkpoints, and one timeline for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and others create a distinct position.

Accessibility — All visible copy is text and the product claims keyboard-first operation; measured contrast passes, but keyboard accessibility of the website itself is not demonstrated.