Subscriptions.ink

Founding member

All your subscriptions in one place

subscriptions.ink ↗
#1
of 43
78 visits sent
🔥 The roast

Subscriptions.ink meticulously tracks every bill except the one for credibility, which is apparently still hiding somewhere in the missing testimonials, case studies, and company page.

Verdict of the median judge. Aimed at the site, never the founder.

Subscriptions.ink verdict card
score 64.2Consensus

Categories (median of 3 judges)

Clarity
87
Pricing
97
Trust
28
Content
68
Design
90
Mobile
85
Speed
85
Tech hygiene
50
Onboarding
55
Differentiation
67
Accessibility
59

Judges

Judge 1glm-5.3-flash69.4
Judge 2gpt-5.6-luna70.4
Judge 3gemini-3.7-flash71.9

What the median judge saw

Clarity — “Track your streaming, software, and cloud services in one place” makes the job clear, with a visible dashboard and “Start tracking free” CTA.

Pricing — Free is $0 forever; Pro is $2.99/month or $29.99/year, with billing cadence, savings, cancellation, refund, terms, and privacy links.

Trust — Recognizable services like Netflix and Spotify appear as examples, but there are no testimonials, case studies, company details, or security page.

Content — Concrete features include price-increase alerts, trial countdowns, JSON/CSV export, and a 12-month forecast; no FAQ or documentation link is shown.

Design — The red, black, and warm off-white palette is consistent, with strong hierarchy, generous spacing, sharp dashboard imagery, and an organized footer.

Mobile — The mobile view has a hamburger menu, large finger-sized CTA, readable type, and no visible side-scroll; no mobile form is shown.

Onboarding — “Set up in minutes” gives three clear steps and promises “Free to start. No credit card required,” but there is no demo, SSO, or quickstart documentation.

Differentiation — “No account connections, no inbox scanning” and “Your data, yours” provide a concrete privacy/control angle, though there is no competitor comparison page.

Accessibility — All supplied copy is real text and contrast testing passes, but keyboard-only behavior is not evidenced and measured heading order skips a level.

Measured facts — our scripts, not the judges

Pricing page existsyes
Price one click awayyes
Privacy policyyes
Termsyes
Contactno
Copyright currentyes
Images all renderyes
Faviconyes
No side-scrollyes
Load time8/10
Page weight9/10
First paint10/10
Image optimization1/10
Layout stability10/10
Console errors10/10
Time to interactive10/10
HTTPS properyes
Cert validyes
HSTSno
CSPno
No mixed contentyes
Meta title+descyes
Preview tagsno
Viewport metayes
Link health10/10
404 handledno
Canonical redirectno
Alt-text coverage7/10
Heading orderno
WCAG contrast10/10
Think your site is better?

Same three judges, same rubric, same evidence. Beat #1 and take the spot.

Put it on the board — $5

Money never affects rank.