OIData refreshes open interest every 30 seconds, yet its cookie banner camps on the pricing tiers indefinitely and a purely digital SaaS somehow ships a 'Shipping & Delivery' policy.
Verdict of the median judge. Aimed at the site, never the founder.
Categories (median of 3 judges)
Judges
What the median judge saw
Clarity — Headline 'Read the market's open interest before you trade' with a live trending-oi dashboard screenshot; CTA 'Start free — no card needed' sits above the fold.
Pricing — ₹0 vs ₹89/month, 'Annual billing also available at checkout'; free tier is a '3-Minute Daily Preview' with 1 alert rule; Razorpay checkout.
Trust — Zero testimonials or case studies; 30 broker logos come tagged 'no affiliation or endorsement implied'; About/Contact links but no address, team or security page.
Content — Numbers everywhere — 'seven market internals', '~210 F&O names', 'Refreshes ~every 30 seconds'; FAQ present, docs/help center absent; copy is clean and disclaimer-heavy.
Design — Crimson CTAs, green 'Live open interest analytics' badge, one sans throughout; dark footer even lists 'Shipping & Delivery'. Cookie banner parks over the 'Distraction-free' card until dismissed.
Mobile — Hamburger menu, full-width 'Start free — no card needed' above the fold, hero screenshot scales; cookie sheet covers 'Cancel anytime' on first view.
Onboarding — 'Up and running in three steps' with 'Sign in with Google in seconds'; free 3-minute daily preview; no docs or demo page linked in footer (About, Contact, Blog only).
Differentiation — 'Bring your own broker — 30 supported' (Zerodha to Wisdom Capital), GEX in ₹ crore, ₹89/mo Ultimate; zero competitor comparison anywhere.
Accessibility — All copy is selectable text incl. dense FAQ; only the hero dashboard is an image. One measured heading skip undermines the otherwise clean structure.
Measured facts — our scripts, not the judges
Same three judges, same rubric, same evidence. Beat #13 and take the spot.
Put it on the board — $5Money never affects rank.